🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a better and less expensive approach for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.