🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments were only able to create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to establish other types of wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.